Designing for Adherence: What Really Keeps Participants Engaged?

Adherence is the silent determinant of success in many clinical and consumer health studies. Regardless of how sophisticated a study design is, or how powerful its endpoints, none of it matters if participants don’t show up, don’t comply, or drop out entirely. And yet, adherence remains one of the most overlooked challenges in research – especially outside traditional clinical settings.

In decentralized, digital, and consumer-facing trials, the participant is more than just a data source. They’re a user of an experience, a decision-maker, and –  most importantly – a human navigating daily life. So, what really drives study adherence? And how can researchers design protocols that participants actually want to follow?

Let’s break it down.

‍

1. Clear Value Proposition for the Participant

If you want someone to adhere to your study, they need to understand why they’re doing it. This is true in pharma trials , but even more so in consumer wellness research, where stakes may feel lower to the participant.

• What’s in it for them? Is it monetary compensation, access to a new product, or the ability to contribute to broader health knowledge?
  
  
• Can they see progress? Just like consumers using wearables, participants are more likely to stick with a study if they can see the value of their data – like sleep trends or energy improvements.
  
  
• Is it aligned with their goals? Studies that resonate with participants’ personal health journeys (e.g., “reducing bloating,” “improving recovery,” “better focus”) tend to see higher adherence.
  
  

Design tip: Incorporate short-term, visible wins into your protocol. Even a simple weekly check-in showing progress can re-engage a drifting participant.

‍

2. Frictionless Experience Design

Many dropouts aren’t due to disinterest, but to difficulty. Confusing instructions, clunky apps, forgotten surveys, or unclear expectations can lead to gradual disengagement.

Researchers need to think like UX designers. Ask:

• Can the study be completed in under 5 minutes per day?
  
  
• Is everything mobile-first and intuitive?
  
  
• Are reminders gentle but effective?
  
  

Modern participants, especially in digital trials, expect the same seamless experience they get from fitness apps or food delivery. Study software should meet that bar.

This is where platforms that rethink research UX, like Alethios, play a critical role, making participation feel more like daily journaling than medical compliance.

‍

3. Transparent Communication and Expectations

Participants need clarity:

• How long will the study last?
  
  
• What exactly is expected of them?
  
  
• Will they need to log food, wear a device, or show up to a clinic?
  
  

Setting expectations early – and reinforcing them gently throughout the study – builds trust. Many researchers underestimate the anxiety participants feel when they’re unsure if they’re “doing it right.”

💡 Tip: A well-designed onboarding flow, educational emails, and transparent dashboards go a long way toward reducing ambiguity and boosting retention.

‍

4. Human Connection, Even Digitally

Even in decentralized trials, people don’t want to feel like data points. They want to feel like they matter.

• Adding a human name and face to study comms (e.g., “Hi, I’m Priya, your study coordinator”) increases engagement.
  
  
• Sharing small updates like “We’ve now reached 100 participants!” helps participants feel like part of something bigger.
  
  
• Proactively checking in when someone misses a few check-ins can turn a dropout into a recommitment.
  
  

At Alethios, we pride ourselves on our 24/7live chat and  text-based support for participants – which has seen huge returns on adherence.

‍

5. Incentives That Make Sense

Compensation matters, but not all incentives are equal.

• Gift cards can feel transactional.
  
  
• Tiered rewards or “gamified” milestones (“complete 7 days in a row and unlock a reward”) often drive higher compliance.
  
  
• Some participants are more motivated by access – to products, health insights, or early results – than by cash.
  
  

Knowing your participant archetype helps: biohackers might want data insights, while working moms may prefer streamlined routines and flexible deadlines.

‍

6. Protocol Simplicity and Flexibility

One of the biggest predictors of dropout is overcomplication.

• Studies that ask participants to use 3+ tools or remember multiple daily tasks introduce too much cognitive load.
  
  
• Even well-meaning researchers often make the mistake of turning their hypothesis into a participant burden.
  
  

Wherever possible, simplify. Then simplify again.

And consider adding grace into your protocols – can participants skip a day and still contribute value? Can devices be passively collected instead of requiring manual input?

Wearables and passive data capture (like step count, HRV, or sleep metrics) are increasingly helpful here. Alethios, for example, integrates with major wearable ecosystems to reduce manual tracking needs.

‍

7. Feedback Loops and Study Visibility

Most participants never see what their data is contributing to. That’s a missed opportunity.

• Letting participants see their own data (even in simple graphs) builds investment.
  
  
• Letting them know what the study is learning makes them feel part of something important.
  
  

“Even if the results aren’t ready yet, we can share anonymized trends: ‘Most participants are reporting improved focus by week 3.’” That kind of storytelling builds stickiness.

‍

In Closing: Good Research is Good Experience Design

We often think of “adherence” as a compliance issue, but in reality, it’s a design challenge. The best studies are the ones people want to participate in, not just tolerate.

At Alethios, we believe the future of research depends on rethinking how we treat participants,  not as passive subjects, but as active contributors. By designing for clarity, simplicity, and human connection, we don’t just reduce dropout rates – we elevate the entire research experience.

‍